< Back to all articles

Examining the Environmental Impact of Blockchain

May 20, 2024

The world's focus on sustainability and environmental responsibility is growing, leading to increased scrutiny of the impact of emerging technologies on our planet. This trend did not overlook the blockchain industry, as people started to realize that the abundance of decentralized, blockchain-based apps, platforms, and services may not only positively impact the financial freedom of people worldwide but also significantly affect the environment. While blockchain unquestionably carries immense promise for drastically altering the course of development for several industries, the size of its potential environmental footprint is disturbing. Let's delve into the ecological implications of this technology and explore possible solutions for promoting sustainability in the crypto space.

Ecological Complications

Arguably, the most pressing challenges when it comes to blockchains are energy consumption, its sources, and old hardware. Energy consumption and the resulting carbon footprint often come to mind when talking about the negative influence the ever-expanding crypto industry has on the planet. Due to some of its mechanisms, particularly the proof-of-work (PoW) algorithm used by Bitcoin, energy consumption may be astronomical. The competing nature of mining and its increasing complexity and expensiveness necessitate both a lot of energy and substantial computational power. Moreover, as Bitcoin's supply is limited and almost entirely mined (reaching closer to 94% of the total supply as of May 2024), its mining becomes increasingly more demanding and expensive for miners.

From an energy perspective, it means miners have to access more and more energy, and unfortunately, this energy is rarely green. Much of the mining activity takes place in areas where electricity is generated from fossil fuels, provoking increased greenhouse gas emissions. Thankfully, the extensive use of non-green sources has resulted in calls for greater transparency and accountability within the crypto industry, with people and projects starting to realize the extent of possible environmental problems.

Another significant challenge, often overlooked, is the accumulation of outdated hardware resulting from mining activities. While some mining rigs or parts can be reused, old hardware is typically too tired to be utilized elsewhere. Therefore, its eco-friendly disposal is a significant problem that needs to be addressed more widely throughout the crypto community. Otherwise, we will see more and more electronic waste dumped irresponsibly.

Measuring Blockchain Activities & Their Impact

Measuring the energy consumption of PoW poses specific challenges, primarily because of the mining's elusive nature. It is difficult to obtain comprehensive data, so researchers often rely on indirect sources like IP addresses or initial public offering (IPO) filings. While these methods are based on factual information, they only provide rough estimates. For instance, some researchers speculate that the annual carbon emissions of the Bitcoin network alone are close to 65 million metric tons of CO2, accounting for 0.2% of global emissions. This level of emissions is similar to that of a small country. Others presume that the carbon emissions from a single Bitcoin transaction are equivalent to those generated by hundreds of thousands of Visa transactions. Even though these numbers can be approximate, and such calculation formulas and models should be further revised and enhanced, the consequences of the skyrocketing popularity of blockchains should not be taken lightly.

Potential Solutions 

Despite these challenges, efforts are underway to encourage sustainability in the crypto space and lessen the further environmental impact of blockchain technology. One approach is transitioning from the energy-intensive PoW consensus mechanism to more environmentally friendly and cost-effective alternatives, such as PoS (Proof-of-Stake) or DPoS (Delegated Proof-of-Stake). Multiple blockchain projects and cryptocurrencies have already adopted these mechanisms to reduce their carbon footprint and increase scalability. One of the most prominent examples is Ethereum's shift to the PoS model, which supposedly led to an above 90% decrease in energy usage.

Additionally, enhancing blockchain technology's efficiency is another crucial aspect of promoting sustainability in resource and environmental management. This can be achieved by moving some, if not all, of the calculations off-chain. Besides optimizing blockchain protocols, developing energy-efficient mining hardware may also play a critical role in lowering energy consumption without undermining security.

Secondly, advancements in renewable energy technologies may help minimize the environmental impact of crypto mining if switching to other consensuses is not attainable by providing access to cleaner energy. From wind to geothermal power and beyond, numerous opportunities exist to harness renewable energy for crypto mining, thereby diminishing dependence on fossil fuels and mitigating carbon emissions.

Thirdly, creating more efficient and eco-friendly ways to reuse hardware or its parts and opening new places for hardware disposal can be very helpful, too. Some electronic recycling facilities will accept old mining equipment and ensure that it is properly recycled or disposed of in an environmentally conscious manner. Such facilities should become more accessible, and the idea of recycling should be advertised more widely within the blockchain community.

Fourthly, creating specialized projects and initiatives dedicated to sustainability is as critical for blockchain's long-term success as the previous solutions. For example, the Ethereum Climate Platform (ECP) was created to address Ethereum's previous carbon footprint and its environmental impact, and the Crypto Climate Accord aims to unite the crypto community and commit to achieving net-zero emissions from crypto-related activities by 2040. Such initiatives allow people to motivate each other to continue creating effective solutions that are mindful of resources, both already spent and still required, and present environmental struggles.

Lastly, implementing methods for offsetting previous damage is another way to show care for our planet's future. By backing different environmental groups, such as those dedicated to reforestation, crypto companies can effectively counteract at least some of the carbon emissions generated by their operations.

Final Thoughts

As blockchain technology continues to mature and expand, reaching various sectors of the economy, it is vital to focus on its ecological trail and practices that we can establish to secure the industry's sustainability. Through innovation, collaboration, and a dedication to environmental responsibility, the crypto industry has the potential to drive positive change toward a more eco-friendly future. Therefore, embracing sustainable methods and harnessing DeFi enthusiasts' capacity for innovation, mindfulness, and aspiration towards positive change can result in a healthier environment and a more resilient planet.

Kinetex Network: Website | Kinetex dApp